IN the evolving political landscape of Nigeria, certain statements resonate more than others, not for their insight or diplomacy but for their potential to undermine the very essence of democracy. A case in point is the recent remarks of the National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Mr. Felix Morka. His words, directed at the Labour Party’s presidential candidate in the 2023 elections, Peter Obi, have sparked widespread outrage and drawn sharp criticisms from many citizens, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar.
During the interview, Morka stated, “Peter Obi has crossed the line so many times, and he has what’s coming to him. Whatever he gets, he should manage it.” These remarks, ostensibly made in response to Obi’s critique of government policies and a national budget that is bereft of measures to address economic hardship. What Morka termed “voodoo economics,” has been widely interpreted as inflammatory and threatening. Despite APC’s clarification that Morka’s comments were taken out of context, the implications of such rhetoric in a democratic society cannot be ignored.
A cornerstone of democracy is the freedom of expression and the healthy exchange of ideas, including criticism of leadership and policies. When opposition figures receive threats instead of reasoned rebuttals, it signals a troubling shift away from democratic norms. Morka’s comments, whether intended as a threat or not, were careless and unbecoming of a spokesperson for a ruling party in a multi-party democracy like Nigeria.
The APC’s subsequent defense of Morka has merely exacerbated the situation. By arguing that his remarks were “in the exclusive context of the question” and dismissing concerns as overblown, the party missed an opportunity to reinforce the values of civility and respect in political engagement. Instead, it chose to double down, with National Chairman Dr. Abdullahi Ganduje dismissing Obi’s claims as misleading and accusing him of inciting online trolls against Morka.
Criticism and dissent are not only allowed but also essential in a functioning democracy. Opposition figures like Peter Obi play a vital role in holding the government accountable and offering alternative perspectives. Labeling such critiques as “crossing the line” therefore sets a dangerous precedent, suggesting that dissent is intolerable and punishable.
Statements like Morka’s, whether explicitly threatening or not, have the potential to stoke political tensions, discourage opposition voices, and alienate citizens who look to their leaders for direction. The APC, as the ruling party, bears a greater responsibility to lead by example, fostering an environment where diverse opinions can thrive without fear of retribution.
Rather than stand by Morka’s inflammatory remarks, the APC should tender an unreserved apology to Peter Obi and the Nigerian people. Acknowledging the error and committing to more constructive engagement would not only diffuse tensions but also demonstrate the party’s commitment to democratic values. Silence or deflection, on the other hand, risks eroding public trust and further polarizing an already divided nation.
Political discourse in Nigeria must rise above petty squabbles and veiled threats. Leaders and their representatives should be mindful of the weight their words carry, especially in a country where political divisions often manifest in violence. Statements like Morka’s, whether intentional or not, can be weaponized, leading to unintended consequences with potential harm to both individuals and the nation.
As Nigeria navigates its path toward sustainable development and democratic consolidation, civility and respect must underpin its political engagements. The 2023 elections, though contentious, demonstrated the resilience of the Nigerian electorate and their desire for change and accountability. Leaders on all sides of the political divides should seek to foster constructive dialogue, respect one another and focus on salient issues that matter most to Nigerians.
Felix Morka’s comments represent a low point in Nigeria’s political discourse and highlight the urgent need for introspection in public communication. It is incumbent upon the APC to take a stand against such rhetoric, not just for Peter Obi’s sake but for the sake of democracy itself. Anything less would be a disservice to the millions of Nigerians who look up to their leaders for guidance and hope.
Nigeria’s democracy is too valuable to be undermined by careless remarks and unnecessary hostility. The APC must rise above partisan desperation and prioritize the health of the nation’s political ecosystem. Democracy, after all, thrives not in the absence of disagreements but in the presence of constructive dialogue.
